Monday, April 18, 2011
    Compare and Contrast
    Maclean’s magazine has been reprimanded by the Quebec Press Council for a controversial cover last year that featured beloved Bonhomme, the Carnaval snowman.
http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/Canada/20110413/macleans-cover-controversy-110413/
As discussed in my blog post last week, magazines like Maclean’s and Toronto Life appear to be held to a higher, or shall we say different standard by the journalistic community, than a highly profitable and well-read alternative publication like NOW.
Compare and contrast the Maclean’s cover to the NOW cover:
    
        
One cover features a human being, the other a cartoon.
One cover suggests an “evil plot”, the other points to history.
One is formally slapped, the other laughs all the way to the bank to cash checks from sex-trade ads.
Maclean’s offered an apology, while NOW offered no apology and further exploited the controversey on its web site.
    http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/Canada/20110413/macleans-cover-controversy-110413/
As discussed in my blog post last week, magazines like Maclean’s and Toronto Life appear to be held to a higher, or shall we say different standard by the journalistic community, than a highly profitable and well-read alternative publication like NOW.
Compare and contrast the Maclean’s cover to the NOW cover:
|  
 | ||
|  | 
One cover suggests an “evil plot”, the other points to history.
One is formally slapped, the other laughs all the way to the bank to cash checks from sex-trade ads.
Maclean’s offered an apology, while NOW offered no apology and further exploited the controversey on its web site.
- Scott Bullock
    Comments (3)
Tweet
Comments:
        
            3. Not impressed says:
          
            25 April 2011 at 10:16 AM
          
            Bad taste is bad tase, no matter how you look at it. Like him or not, mayor or no mayor, that is a person on Now's cover, and he does not deserve to be mocked in such a manner. However, I salute Now for standing by its guns.  The Maclean's management immediately assumed the position and puckered up by throwing their staff under the bus. I don't like either cover, but I do support any magazine that doesn't sell out. And interestingly enough, Now didn' t sell out
        
            2. An Editor says:
          
            22 April 2011 at 12:50 AM
          
            The Maclean's cover threatened to breach copyright law. The NOW cover did nothing of the sort. Different legal issues entirely.
        
            1. mike says:
          
            21 April 2011 at 5:44 PM
          
            yes and perhaps that's because there is so little journalism in Now
        About Me
  Scott Bullock|  | 
|  | 
scottbullock(at)rogers(dot)com
Note to readers: some of Bullock's posts may refer to his clients.
Most Recent Blog Comment
  |  | |
| Kelly says: | |
| Any news on how it performed on newsstands?... | |
Blog Archive
|  | 
2017 (75)
 | 
|  | 
2016 (43)
 | 
|  | 
2015 (86)
 | 
|  | 
2014 (59)
 
 | 
|  | 
2013 (101)
 
 | 
|  | 
2012 (81)
 
 | 
|  | 
2011 (75)
 
 | 
|  | 
2010 (53)
 
 | 













